W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

RE: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:07:50 -0500 (EST)
To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
cc: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0503031202130.4752-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

>   xs:dateTime is an instant in time, not a period of time

Ask me Tuesday.

>   xs:duration is a period of time, not an instant in time

Ask me in three days (implied: from now).

>  This proposal would make us look stupid to the entire community

I hardly think so.  A duration only makes sense when you have a base
time to use it with.  What's the base time here?  Is it when the server
sent the message, or the receiver got it?  And suppose it's not HTTP-HTTP
but HTTP-SMTP?

        /r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 17:07:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT