W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:37:51 -0500 (EST)
To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
cc: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0503011532570.15366-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> Any reason not to use xs:duration rather than xs:unsignedInt or some
> derived type of it?

They seem much more complicated then a simple integer.

For example, the length of a duration depends on when you send it (e.g.,
1M1D could be anywhere from 29 to 32 days).

	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2005 20:37:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT