W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-06-27

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:36:31 -0400
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <42BCED5F.2060507@tibco.com>
Mark Nottingham wrote

>     2005-06-20: lc20 - David Hull to write up proposal regarding 
> "return to sender" semantics for anonymous.  PENDING

Replace the paragraph reading

    Due to the range of network technologies currently in wide-spread
    use (e.g., NAT, DHCP, firewalls), many deployments cannot assign a
    meaningful global IRI to a given endpoint. To allow these
    "anonymous" endpoints to send and receive messages, WS-Addressing
    defines the following pre-defined URI for use by endpoints that
    cannot have a stable, resolvable IRI:
    "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous". Messages whose
    [reply endpoint], [source endpoint] and/or [fault endpoint] use this
    address MUST rely on some out-of-band mechanism for delivering
    replies or faults (e.g. returning the reply on the same transport

With this text:

    Some transport bindings, notably SOAP/HTTP, provide a means of
    returning a message directly to the sender of that message,
    regardless of its contents.  To allow for direct use of such a
    facility, WS-Addressing defines the URI
    "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/sender" to indicate that the
    destination is the sender: This URI MAY be used as the [address] of
    the [reply endpoint] and/or [fault endpoint] addressing property,
    but SHOULD NOT be so used if the transport binding is known not to
    provide a return facility.
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2005 05:36:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:09 UTC