W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages?

From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:55:24 -0700
Message-ID: <42B6F4FC.7050001@webmethods.com>
To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
CC: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

That was one of the issues that was raised in 
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc1 also.
TC was not prepared to make it even a SHOULD requirement in the context 
of  discussion of that issue :)
Now that 86 is closed with no action also, I am not holding up hopes but 
I think having [message id] in all messages is very useful.

David Hull wrote:

>If [message id] is to be leveraged for uses other than correlation,
>particularly duplicate elimination and security, wouldn't those
>considerations apply at least equally well to non request/reply
>interactions?  If not, what is the basis for requiring [message id] for
>requests but not for other types of message?
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 16:55:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:09 UTC