- From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:19:08 +0100
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, <tom@coastin.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
<snip /> > > > If we did this change, the relibility specs might utilize ws addressing > > message Id when present in a message. > > And they wouldn't if we didn't? Why? Further to Rich's question... What if another spec has a similar but not identical requirement? Shall the WS-Addressing spec be changed to accommodate that requirement? Why couldn't the reliability spec say something like "we use the message identity from WS-Addressing and we introduce this additional SOAP header to capture the index"? Much cleaner approach me thinks. Best regards, .savas.
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 17:19:21 UTC