W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > June 2005

Re: on LC75

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:40:18 +0200
To: tom@coastin.com
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <9CCA283C-58E1-4FE9-8ACE-54DE0393E7A6@Sun.COM>
If we go this route I'd like to suggest we also add an optional  
timestamp field. I've had several requests for WS-addressing to offer  
support for such a thing separate from the message id itself.

Marc.

On Jun 4, 2005, at 3:36 AM, Tom Rutt wrote:

>
> Tom make messageID useful for next versions of either ws- 
> reliability or ws reliable messageing,  it should be a complex type.
>
> A group ID ( which is globally unique in space and time) along with  
> an optional sequence number integer attribute would make
> this wsa:messageID useable by these other specs.
>
> If sequences are not required, then the optional integer sequence  
> number attribute would not have to be present.
>
> Otherwise, a request response exchange using reliability will  
> require two different message ids, one for wsa another for ws-rx.
>
> I will send a future message with the simple schema for this.
>
> TomRutt
>
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt    email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>
>

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.




Received on Saturday, 4 June 2005 06:40:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT