W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > July 2005

RE: Action without UsingAddressing

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:43:00 -0400
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B27012E0793@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>


+1 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Anish Karmarkar
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 1:04 PM
> To: Arun Gupta
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Action without UsingAddressing
> 
> 
> There aren't any required/mustUnderstand rules for attribute 
> extensions 
> (which is what wsaw:Action is) in WSDL. If wsaw:Action is present 
> without a wsaw:UsingAddressing on the corresponding 
> binding/port then I 
> would think it would be up to the WSDL processor to decide whether it 
> wants to ignore wsaw:Action or not (in which case it will 
> have to engage 
> ws-addressing).
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Arun Gupta wrote:
> > 
> > If the WSDL does not contain wsaw:UsingAddressing in either 
> wsdl:binding 
> > or wsdl:port but some of the wsdl:portType/ 
> wsdl:operation(s) contain 
> > wsaw:Action, what is the expected  behavior in such case ?
> > 
> > I would expect that we ignore wsaw:Action on wsdl:operation. WSDL 
> > Binding does not seem to say anything about such a case.
> > 
> > -Arun
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:42:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:06 GMT