W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > July 2005

Re: XML 1.1 support in Addressing: arguments, counter-arguments, and consequences

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:55:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnotting@gmail.com>
cc: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0507272352460.30807-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> I think the question is whether those new documents have to be
> complete re-statements of the Addressing specs (because they don't
> accommodate XML 1.1), or if they can just be an incremental change
> describing how to use XML 1.1 with Addressing.

If that's the question, I think it's a mistaken one.  The
XML 1.1 version doesn't have to be a complete restatement, it can be
written as a "diff."  There's absolutely no requirement that an "xml 1.1
version" of a spec be stand-alone.

In other words, I'm convinced this is a non-issue, and that NOT addressing
1.1 now will not impact future work for 1.1 when the other specs (e.g.,
Schema and SOAP) are ready.


Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 03:56:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:10 UTC