> I think the question is whether those new documents have to be > complete re-statements of the Addressing specs (because they don't > accommodate XML 1.1), or if they can just be an incremental change > describing how to use XML 1.1 with Addressing. If that's the question, I think it's a mistaken one. The XML 1.1 version doesn't have to be a complete restatement, it can be written as a "diff." There's absolutely no requirement that an "xml 1.1 version" of a spec be stand-alone. In other words, I'm convinced this is a non-issue, and that NOT addressing 1.1 now will not impact future work for 1.1 when the other specs (e.g., Schema and SOAP) are ready. /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.htmlReceived on Thursday, 28 July 2005 03:56:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:06 GMT