W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2005

RE: NEW ISSUE: [relationship] Order of URI pairs is ambiguous

From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:22:04 +1100
Message-ID: <7997F38251504E43B38435DAF917887F40C2A4@ausyms23.ca.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Grammatically, you should not use "first" and "second" with just two items; should be "former" and "latter". But "first" and "second" are probably better for readers whose English is not perfect, I suppose. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Jonathan Marsh 
	Sent: Tue 01-Feb-05 4:30 
	To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: NEW ISSUE: [relationship] Order of URI pairs is ambiguous
	
	


	Section 3 of the Core spec says that [relationship] is a pair of URIs,
	one identifying the relationship, and another identifying the
	corresponding [message id].  The text doesn't say clearly what the order
	of these pairs is, though there is an implication that the type of the
	relationship is first, the related message id second.
	
	Proposal: Clarify the implication, possibly by simply adding "the first
	URI of each pair is..." and "the second URI of each pair is...".
	
	
	
	
	
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 19:26:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:01 GMT