W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal

From: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:25:24 -0000
Message-ID: <015001c4feec$c924ddf0$abfd6043@exhp>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Why's this text needed if the spec (and associated schema) say it has a
cardinality of exactly 1?

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:43 AM
Subject: Issue i009 - Multiple actions. Proposal


>
> I had an action to make a proposal for closing issue i009 - Multiple
> actions. The general feeling in the room at the face-to-face seemed to
> be that sticking with one action (possibly per actor/role depending on
> how we close issue i007) was fine, but we needed to call this out in the
> spec and point out that layered specifications need to take this into
> account. Here is the proposal:
>
> Add the following sentence to the description of the [action] property
> in section 3 of the core spec.
>
> Protocol and application designers building on this
> specification are encouraged to take care when designing their protocols
> or applications that they do not violate the requirement that there
> be exactly one [action] property.
>
> Flames, comments, suggestions to the usual address.
>
> Gudge
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2005 12:39:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:01 GMT