W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2005

RE: i009 - mustIgnore rule for multiple To, ReplyTo, etc.

From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 02:13:38 -0000
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA8001AAF3A5@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>, <tom@coastin.com>
Cc: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <tim@mindreef.com>

Would there have been a discussion like this if all the addressing
related information elements were encapsulated in a WSA-specific header?

<soap:Header>
  <wsa:addressing soap:mustUnderstand="true">
    <wsa:To> +
    <wsa:ReplyTo>*
    <wsa:FaultTo>*
    <wsa:any namespace="##other">* <!--This to allow DaveO's V2 -->
  </wsa:addressing>
</soap:Header>

I vaguely remember something like this being discussed already and
rejected. Am I right? Sorry, but I couldn't find anything relevant in
the archives.

(Note, don't confuse this with the wrapper proposal for RefProps/Params)
--
Savas Parastatidis
http://savas.parastatidis.name
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 02:14:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:01 GMT