- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:16:45 -0800
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
I also notice that the spec text details some places where @any is
allowed, but other times doesn't (e.g. wsa:Address). We should make the
spec and the schema match, perhaps providing a generic list of attribute
extensibility points (which are throughout the structure).
/wsa:EndpointReference/@{any}
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:Address/@{any}
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:ReferenceParameters/@{any}
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:InterfaceName@{any}
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:ServiceName/@{any}
/wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:Policies/@{any}
These are extensibility mechanisms to allow additional attributes
to be specified.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Salz
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:16 AM
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Schema now available ( was RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-
> 02-21)
>
>
> > Regarding my action item to check that the schema matched the spec,
> I
> > was unable to find a schema either in CVS or at the end of the
> namespace
> > URI
>
> It was posted to the mailing list:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> addressing/2004Nov/0522.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-
> addressing/2005Jan/0004.html
>
> Yours and mine look pretty similar (mine's prettier :). I think the
> biggest difference is that your missing anyattribute in the
> ReferenceParametersType.
> /r$
>
> --
> Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> DataPower Technology
> http://www.datapower.com
> XS40 XML Security Gateway
> http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 22:17:23 UTC