- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:20:10 -0000
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Anish wrote: > Subissue iii: > An EPR allows one to include (optionally) a service endpoint/port. > If such an endpoint/port is included in an EPR, what is the relationship > between the value of the [address] property and the URI value in the > [service-port] property? We have said that the [address] property is a > logical address and not necessarily the physical endpoint where messages > can be sent and how the mapping between logical to physical takes place > is an extensibility point. Is that true if a service QName is present in > the EPR. I.e., should our spec say that if the service QName is present > then the physical address is what is specified by the wsdl port. > > This subissue is not resolved yet. The core specification uses the term "network address" and "logical address" and now we're discussing a "physical address". I find these terms confusing given they are all URIs. My preference is to remove them from Web Services Addressing altogether. If they are to remain, I'd then like to see a definition of their precise meaning. Paul -- Paul Downey BT Exact +44(0)1442 296260 paul.downey@bt.com http://blog.whatfettle.com
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 13:19:01 UTC