Tom: > Well, what if the publisher of the epr wants to but the > actual http url as the wsa:to address. How is this usage > distinguished by the more abstract "logical" address use case > you are championing. Why isn't a http URL logical? It is a logical address that happens to be resolved by an application-specific combination of DNS lookup and Web Server at message transfer time. Savas' prior example of using a URN to address a service hosted on a P2P network is no different really. > Perhaps we need a "choice" element to distinguish the two use cases. > There will be many epr > publishers which want to put a url to direct the http request > to in the wsa:to field. I don't agree. All addresses are logical (Paul Downey has a good blog post which alludes to this: http://blog.whatfettle.com/archives/000244.html). JimReceived on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 23:37:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:03 GMT