The section ends with Therefore, a consuming application should assume that different XML Schemas, WSDL definitions and policies apply to endpoint references whose addresses differ. Shouldn't this properly read (changes italicized): Therefore, a consuming application should /not /assume that /the same /XML Schemas, WSDL definitions and policies apply to endpoint references whose addresses differ. That is, EPRs with different destination addresses might still happen to use the same schemas and WSDL, but we can't assume that. While we're at it, should "should not" be "MUST NOT"?Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 21:53:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:03 GMT