W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2005

Re: Thoughts on TAG issue EndpointsRef47

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:21:46 -0500 (EST)
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0502061018130.24510-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

A significant problem with putting wsa:To as the request-URI is that
end-to-end content protection and integrity (signing and encryption)
is lost.

Or are you saying it should be *copied* and not moved?  That's what SMTP
typically does, although RCPT-TO isn't the same as the To header (cf
mailing lists).  That separation isn't something HTTP seems to support,
although perhaps it should.

Does the issue get resolved if we add a wsa:Request-URI to the EPR

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Sunday, 6 February 2005 15:21:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:03 GMT