W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2005

Re: test 1230 and 1231 appear to be the same

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:39:18 -0500
To: Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <B75C20C9-EAA9-4A42-B843-F3376E17734C@Sun.COM>
On Dec 8, 2005, at 8:42 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:

> Yes but neither of them explicitly define the ReplyTo endpoint as  
> far as I can see (and it seems like 1231 should). I found another  
> person in the ws-addressing-test archives who notes the same thing:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-tests/ 
> 2005Dec/0002.html
>
I see, I guess I misread your first message.

Marc.

>
> Marc Hadley wrote:
>> This may be deliberate. The spec says that if the ReplyTo 'element  
>> is NOT present then the value of the [address] property of the  
>> [reply endpoint] EPR is "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/ 
>> anonymous"'. The two cases test explicit and implicit anonymous  
>> reply endpoints.
>>
>> Marc.
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Tests 1230 and 1231 appear to be the exact same.
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1230
>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1231
>>>
>>> For 1231 the text says "Two-way message exchange containing an  
>>> Action and a ReplyTo of anonymous. All other fields are  
>>> defaulted." - but in the linked to message there is no ReplyTo  
>>> defined. I'm assuming this is the critical difference between the  
>>> two tests cases and someone just left the ReplyTo out?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - Dan
>>>
>>> --Dan Diephouse
>>> Envoi Solutions LLC
>>> http://netzooid.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---
>> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
>> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://netzooid.com
>

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.




Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 14:41:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:10 GMT