W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > August 2005

Re: wsa:To -> SOAP1.2's ImmediateDestination

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:13:07 -0400
To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050824181307.GK17056@markbaker.ca>

Marc,

On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:31:40AM -0400, Marc Hadley wrote:
> >Yes, I understand that to be your (and others) positions.  I believe
> >that position is inconsistent with the HTTP specification, and
> >possibly inconsistent with the SOAP specification (per the ambiguity
> >over what ImmediateDestination means).
> >
> Its not so much that its my position, its just what the spec says  
> right now. I know you've pointed out an ambiguity in one part of the  
> spec but I quoted several other parts where that ambiguity is not  
> present and reflects the interpretation I describe above.

I checked back through your messages in this thread but the only one
that I found that quotes any part of the spec is;

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Aug/0057.html

I believe my position is entirely consistent with what you quoted.

> IMO, the SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding clearly treats intermediaries as HTTP  
> gateways, I agree that there's ambiguity in the text you point to but  
> your desired interpretation is not borne out by the rest of the  
> specification.

Which parts?

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.          http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies   http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:11:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:08 GMT