W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > April 2005

i056 Proposal

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 18:56:00 -0400
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <44882f49347dca772f73f35d0ecb5738@Sun.COM>

I took an action to generate a proposal for closing issue 56[1]. The 
issue concerns how to determine the value of the [destination] property 
when sending messages to an endpoint described in WSDL. The proposal is 
as follows:

- Allow a wsa:EndpointReference element to be included as a child of 
wsdl20:endpoint or wsdl11:port.
- When a wsa:EndpointReference element is present as a child of a 
wsdl20:endpoint/wsdl11:port the usual WS-Addressing/binding rules apply 
[destination]=wsa:EndpointReference/wsa:Address.
- When there is no wsa:EndpointReference child element, the 
[destination] property is taken from the endpoint or port address - 
endpoint/@address (WSDL 2.0) or the applicable WSDL 1.1 extension (for 
SOAP it is taken from soap:address/@location).
- If there is no wsa:EndpointReference and the endpoint or port address 
is not specified then the value of [destination] is the anonymous URI.
- If there is both a wsa:EndpointReference and an endpoint/port address 
then they must have the same value.

Marc.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i056

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 22 April 2005 22:56:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT