> The "hole" you describe with pipelining applies equally to all SOAP > headers and the SOAP body as well. It is not constrained to > ref props/params. I don't understand what the issue is really. The issue is that WS-Addressing seems to be the only spec (that I know of; so many specs, so little time), that essentially rewrites things so that data is now "generic" SOAP header blocks. As I have tried to show in two (soon to be three) notes, this makes end-to-end security of WS-Addressing information effectively impossible to achieve using the current SOAP binding mechanism. I think that's bad. /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.htmlReceived on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 22:29:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT