W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032]

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:41:19 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DD8F@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <rsalz@datapower.com>, <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

damned if we do, damned if we don't .. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com]
Sent: 21 November 2004 15:29
To: Downey,PS,Paul,XSJ67A C; rsalz@datapower.com; sanjiva@watson.ibm.com
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032]


Likewise, my experience suggests that if we were to support XML 1.1 it
is certain to be questioned again later. :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of paul.downey@bt.com
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 2:53 AM
> To: rsalz@datapower.com; sanjiva@watson.ibm.com
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: New Issue: use XSD to describe the syntax [i032]
> 
> 
> Rich wrote:
> > I think that if this WG wants to address XML1.1 -- perhaps
> > someone should open a new issue on that exact point
> 
> if as a WG we elect to ignore XML 1.1 it is very likely to
> be questioned again later. i'll raise a separate issue as a
> placeholder for this discussion.
> 
> Paul
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 13:40:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT