W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: 14 Nov 2004 08:10:16 -0400
To: dorchard@bea.com, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-Id: <20041114130148.TBHR1226.to5email2.gprs.rogers.com@acm.org>

The problem was that my complaint was targetted at the submission, but it was too late to do anything about that once the submission was accepted. I'd expect that a fresh WG draft would be another matter altogether.

-----Original Message-----
From:  David Orchard
Date:  04-11-13 16:48
To:  Mark Baker, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subj:  RE: i0001: EPRs as identifiers

I thought you'd already asked the TAG to look at this and the TAG
decided not to and you rescinded your request?  Or do you think that a
WG requesting examination of this issue will be treated differently?

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:45 AM
> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: i0001: EPRs as identifiers
> 
> 
> Given the aggressive publication schedule, combined with the
> inevitability of this issue finding itself in front of the TAG, as
well
> as the delays implicit with the impending holiday season, I'd suggest
> that it would be prudent for the WG to request TAG input ASAP.  That
is,
> of course, assuming that there's concensus to adopt Dave's proposal,
and
> not, say, my alternative proposal of defining an epr URI scheme and
> mapping.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark.
Received on Sunday, 14 November 2004 13:11:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT