W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues)

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:44:45 -0800
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A50590E4C6@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@Newcastle.Ac.Uk>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Savas wrote:
> - simpler processing of the message by applications or intermediaries
> I personally don't see why wsa:action enables these. Checking the
> of the wsa:action header isn't as simple as checking the qname of the
> soap:Body child in order to infer semantics or any other
> protocol-specific header as suggested in [1]? 

Sometimes it's not so simple to check the QName of the soap:Body child.
Sanjiva listed security and reliability as complicating factors [1].

Received on Monday, 8 November 2004 19:45:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC