W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addr issues

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:49:04 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DCF5@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <dorchard@bea.com>, <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Cc: <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <curbera@us.ibm.com>, <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, <mark.little@arjuna.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>, <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Dave wrote:
> Should we break our charter requirements
> and do a lengthy WS-Addressing, I truly believe that the world will
> simply just use the WS-Addressing member submission and not move the
> WS-A Recommendation.  I believe this concern partially led to the
> charter being created the way it is.

that's my reading too. the risk of people just using the submission as-is as 
opposed to a rec is that there is no W3C process surrounding a note or 
submission, so we'll end up with errata, issues and test cases having to be 
published somewhere else, such as in the WS-I, which only server to extend
the timeline further to when we can actually address async SOAP messages.
 
so i'd encourage us all to keep one eye on the clock: by all means let's fix
issues in the submission where stuff is obviously very broken, but not 
treat this working group as if we're starting from first principles.
 
Paul
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 19:48:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT