W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: NEW ISSUE

From: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 17:13:11 +0000
Message-Id: <F89D63E3-2F4D-11D9-BBE3-00039399DACE@arjuna.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>

Mark, I already said I would do that. I thought you were asking a 
follow-on question about whether that was really necessary.

Mark.

On 5 Nov 2004, at 16:34, Mark Nottingham wrote:

>
> I don't see enough information yet to justify a separate issue; both 
> question the purpose and utility of the Action property. If you'd like 
> to raise a new issue, please provide more information, and 
> differentiate it from this one.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Mark Little wrote:
>
>> I'd prefer to have this as a separate issue. If we decided to drop 
>> wsa:Action (which I doubt), then i017 is superfluous. If we decided 
>> to keep it in some form, then it's not.
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>> On 5 Nov 2004, at 13:31, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Can we consider this as part of i017, or is it really separate?
>>>
>>>> i017 Purpose of the Action property
>>>> Why is it neccessary to be able to specify a non-default Action? 
>>>> Why are non-unique Action headers allowed? What is the relationship 
>>>> between the  action value and the operation name?
>>>
>>> (Also, please include a description of the issue along with "NEW 
>>> ISSUE"; otherwise, we'll just have a monster "NEW ISSUE" thread. :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 5, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Mark Little wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not exactly sure of the wording you'd require, but here goes:
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose raising a new issue on the utility of 
>>>> wsa:Action and its presence in a specification about addressing.
>>>>
>>>> Mark.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----
>>>> Mark Little,
>>>> Chief Architect,
>>>> Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
>>>>
>>>> www.arjuna.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
>>> Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
> Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
>
>
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 17:14:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT