W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addr issues

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:30:26 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DCF1@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <tom@coastin.com>, <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <mark.little@arjuna.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>
> WSDL: operation names appear in the child of the soap body.
i realise you're bringing your knowledge of the WS-I Basic 
Profile[1] to the table, but this behaviour isn't mandated in 
WSDL 2.0. Trying to constrain people to using the Global 
Element Declaration (GED) for dispatching proved to be devisive:


> It seems broken to me to have to rely on something outside the 
> soap body to dispatch the operation.
my reading of the BP encourages the use of HTTP SOAPAction.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 11:29:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC