W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 12:44:23 -0500
Message-ID: <418A6A77.4000605@datapower.com>
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
CC: Mark Little <mark.little@arjuna.com>, Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org

> I predict that an optional WSA:Action will have the same effect IF there
> is no mandatory/normative way of generating a WSA:Action infset property
> from any binding that hasn't serialized the WSA:Action as a soap header
> block.

I'm inclined to agree.  I propose that if there is no WSA:Action, then 
it be equivalent to the value
where "." is the child element of the SOAP Body element.  As in


Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 17:38:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC