W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addr issues

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 04:23:28 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DCDA@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <dorchard@bea.com>, <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>, <dug@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Dave wrote:
> I agree that there should be a getmetadata operation that 
should be usable by anyone not just ws-addressing.  That 
safely removes it from the scope of ws-addressing without 
us having to talk about charter and timelines :-)
+1, especially given there may be many contracts available to 
describe a given endpoint, in WSDL 1.1. 2.0, whatever.. 
i'd expect you'd need a mechanism for the sender to discover 
and negotiate the preferred contract, well out of scope for
this WG.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 04:22:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:06 UTC