> Or whether it makes sense to say that omission of a <wsa:To> is > equivalent to including one with the well know 'anonymous' URI as its > value. How about the empty element, <was:To/>? It's a lot less confusing to see a signed empty element then it is to recognize that an added element isn't covered by the appropriate signature. /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.htmlReceived on Friday, 17 December 2004 02:09:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT