W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

RE: Another way of thinking about EPRs

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:35:10 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DE32@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <tim@mindreef.com>, <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Hi Tim!
> I'm willing to ignore the WSDL header mechanism because it sucks 
> (in 1.1 at least, I don't know about 2.0), 
the 1.1 header mechanism was removed from 2.0 and left to extension mechanisms
such as features and properties ('properties' is a term now so overloaded it's 
meaningless) . After DaveO and Yaron and Glen pushed water uphill for a few 
months we ended up with the ADD 'predefined extension':

so yes. it still sucks, probably worse than ever. That's mainly because many 
folks think allowing applications to shove arbritary headers into messages 
without referencing a processing model is basically a sucky thing to do.
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 23:34:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC