W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

Re: Another way of thinking about EPRs

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:08:02 -0500
Message-ID: <41B9E602.8060800@datapower.com>
To: "Srinivas, Davanum M" <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

> So I ask again, - Is there consensus on whether we need some
> "annotation"? (could be wrappers, could be attributes, could be
> something else entirely). 

I think the question is "must refp's" be recognizable as such?

I believe it's probably 60-40 "yes".  But it's too early to call, there 
are lots of issues, and the polls don't close in California for three 
more hours. :)

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 17:59:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT