W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI

From: Harris Reynolds <hreynolds@webmethods.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:17:51 -0500
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD940706B5C703@maileast>
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

This is easily done with the RelatesTo element content, but doesn't require
the RelationshipType attribute.  Right?  The question is what is a use case
for this attribute.


Harris Reynolds
webMethods, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:08 PM
To: Harris Reynolds; Martin Gudgin; Rich Salz
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI

Correlate between a request and a response done with 2 asych messages.  

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Harris Reynolds
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:48 AM
> To: 'Martin Gudgin'; Rich Salz
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI
> 
> 
> This is related, but slightly off topic.  Why do we need the
relationship
> type attribute in the first place?  What use case does it satisfy?
> 
> 
> Harris Reynolds
> webMethods, Inc.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin
Gudgin
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:57 PM
> To: Rich Salz; Harris Reynolds
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI
> 
> 
> Given that we have deal with "QNames in Content" anyway, what's the
> motivation for moving from QName to URI for the @RelationshipType?
> 
> Gudge
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rich Salz
> > Sent: 02 December 2004 19:49
> > To: Harris Reynolds
> > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI
> >
> >
> > I totally agree that we should not replace qname's with URI's
> > when they
> > come from the outside (e.g WSDL), but that we should use
> > URI's for our own
> > stuff.
> > 	/r$
> >
> > --
> > Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
> > DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
> > XS40 XML Security Gateway
http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> > XML Security Overview
> > http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
> >
> >
> >
Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 18:19:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT