* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2004-12-03 06:56-0800] > In general, +1. It seems to me that any rationale for moving part of > WSA QNames to URIs would be to provide some kind of benefit. I'm not > strongly against moving relationshipType to URIs, but I'd like a > stronger reason than "because". I think that the motivation is not just "because", but the TAG finding on QNames that I'm sure you're familiar with: | In so far as the identification mechanism of the Web is the URI and | QNames are not URIs, it is a mistake to use a QName for identification | when a URI would serve. As this is internal to Addressing, it seems like a simple and natural change to do. So I quite like Harris's proposal. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 19:35:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:00 GMT