Re: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI

On Dec 2, 2004, at 7:14 PM, Harris Reynolds wrote:
>
> Despite the TAG finding regarding this kind of issue [4], it seems 
> that this is a case where using a QName is much more natural. For now 
> I am +1 on changing the Relationship type to anyUri and -1 on changing 
> the wsdl:portTypes and wsdl:service QNames to URIs.
>
I pretty much agree, changing the relationship type is a no-brainer, 
coming up with our own mapping of QName to URI for naming WSDL 
constructs is OTT.

Marc.

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.