W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > December 2004

Re: i037: Replace QName's with anyURI

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:53:15 -0500
To: Harris Reynolds <hreynolds@webmethods.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <71A03E82-4543-11D9-B705-000A95BC8D92@Sun.COM>

On Dec 2, 2004, at 7:14 PM, Harris Reynolds wrote:
> Despite the TAG finding regarding this kind of issue [4], it seems 
> that this is a case where using a QName is much more natural. For now 
> I am +1 on changing the Relationship type to anyUri and -1 on changing 
> the wsdl:portTypes and wsdl:service QNames to URIs.
I pretty much agree, changing the relationship type is a no-brainer, 
coming up with our own mapping of QName to URI for naming WSDL 
constructs is OTT.


Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 3 December 2004 15:53:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:07 UTC