- From: Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:57:18 +0000
- To: paul.downey@bt.com
- CC: gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com, public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
paul.downey@bt.com wrote: > I've been thinking about Glen's concern about REQUIRED|OPTIONAL| > INFORMATIONAL wrt the testsuite. > > Now the testsuite has done its job and helped demonstrate > interoperability of the CR versions of the Core and SOAP binding > specifications, and we have a snapshot of the CR report, > I suggest adding a new attribute to each testcase, > > status='REQUIRED|OPTIONAL|INFORMATIONAL' > > to indicate if the testcase exhibits a required, optional > or informational feature, irrespective of our 'CR' report. > Sounds good to me. > I guess we could also contemplate continuing to accept new > testcases if they were submitted in the form of a testcases.xml > snippit and an example document and reused the notify and > echo 'operations'. There would be no expectation that our > existing endpoints would send such tests, but chances are > they'd work with them if they fell within the remit of our > PR specs. > Agreed. > And as for WSDL CR testing, well that's another story, > and one probably layered upon the current suite, and something > I have to confess to being mostly clueless about what > it would demonstrate, exactly ;-) > ;-) Mark. > Paul > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 11:56:18 UTC