W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

RE: test1149 and test1249 [was RE: New test]

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:03:49 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2701987019@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>


I'm not exactly sure why this should be any different than, for
instance, tests 1140 and 1143... 1140 tests a required feature, and 1143
tests the same required feature but for a different case.  They're both
important and both marked REQUIRED.

Just because the assertions are already "covered" by different tests
doesn't mean that this test isn't checking a piece of required behavior,
and in fact one which most implementations are currently doing
incorrectly.

Personally, I'd leave it REQUIRED, since it's not testing an optional
feature and it covers a case the other tests don't.  *shrug*

--G 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: paul.downey@bt.com [mailto:paul.downey@bt.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 7:53 AM
> To: Glen Daniels
> Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
> Subject: test1149 and test1249 [was RE: New test]
> 
> I've added two new test cases, and marked them
> as INFORMATIONAL for now as they exhibit
> REQUIRED features, we already have coverage of 
> the 'features' elsewhere, so I don't think they're
> stricktly REQUIRED for CR.
> 
> We can upgrade them if we go through another
> round of CR testing for Core, SOAP or even WSDL
> - make sense?
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com]
> Sent: Fri 3/17/2006 11:31 PM
> To: Downey,P,Paul,CXMA C
> Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
> Subject: RE: New test
>  
> 
> D'oh, I knew I'd forget something!
> 
> The new message (duplicateToReplyToNone.xml?) should look just like
> duplicateToRequest.xml, but with a ReplyTo of none:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <soap11:Envelope
> xmlns:soap11="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
>   <soap11:Header>
>     <wsa:Action>http://example.org/action/echoIn</wsa:Action>
>  
> <wsa:MessageID>urn:uuid:BCF59302-0E0B-4EF8-B581-6F2DAFF007AF</
> wsa:Messag
> eID>
>     <wsa:To>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</wsa:To>
>     <wsa:To>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</wsa:To>
>     <wsa:ReplyTo>
>  
> <wsa:Address>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none</wsa:Address>
>     </wsa:ReplyTo>
>   </soap11:Header>
>   <soap11:Body>
>     <m:echoIn xmlns:m="http://example.org/echo">Echo This
> Text</m:echoIn>
>   </soap11:Body>
> </soap11:Envelope>
> 
> --Glen 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: paul.downey@bt.com [mailto:paul.downey@bt.com] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:29 PM
> > To: Glen Daniels; public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: New test
> > 
> > I'm looking into adding this new test when I noticed test1140 
> > and test1146 already send the duplicateToRequest.xml message.
> > 
> > So how are these tests different to your new one - I'd expect 
> > the example messages to be different!?
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org on behalf of 
> > Glen Daniels
> > Sent: Thu 3/16/2006 11:55 PM
> > To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
> > Subject: New test
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Here's the test I was suggesting, in what I hope is the 
> right format.
> > 
> > Should we do both a SOAP 1.1 and a SOAP 1.2 version of this?
> > 
> > --G
> > 
> >   <testcase xml:id="test1149"
> >     cr="REQUIRED">
> >     <title>SOAP 1.1 two-way message with a duplicate To 
> > header and a ReplyTo of none.</title>
> >     <description><![CDATA[Two-way message exchange containing 
> > a duplicate To header and ReplyTo of none.  An 
> > InvalidAddressingHeader fault should be generated, but not 
> > sent due to the ReplyTo header.]]></description>
> >     <features>
> > 	<feature>soap08</feature>
> >       <feature>core10</feature>
> >     </features>
> >     <message-exchange type="SOAP11-HTTP-In-Out-Fault"
> > addr-binding="soap11">
> > 	<message from="A" to="B"
> > document="echo/soap11/duplicateToRequest.xml" name="message">
> > 	    <assert 
> > test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:To) = 2"/> 
> >           <assert
> > test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address = 
> > 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none'">
> >           <assert 
> > test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:FaultTo)
> > = 0"/>
> > 	</message>
> > 	<message from="B" to="A"/>
> >     </message-exchange>
> >   </testcase>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 16:04:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC