> > One way or another we should definitely add some tests. > > feel free to submit test cases, I think the format is fairly > clear. At this stage I think they'd be 'OPTIONAL' or 'INFORMATIONAL' > unless they're aimed specifically at WSDL CR. Er... I think we should perhaps gather opinions on this. The problem is that the results for WSO2 -> just-about-everyone are actually (assuming our interpretation is correct) logs demonstrating IMPROPER behaviour according to our current spec. If I get a message with no FaultTo, a ReplyTo of "none", and a duplicate To header, we should NOT be getting a fault back on the HTTP backchannel. So, we should really probably fix the test assertions (by adding something like "(no ReplyTo) OR (ReplyTo == anonymous)") for a bunch of these tests, and also add the new one I described (I'll submit that in the correct format). I don't think this should be OPTIONAL or INFORMATIONAL. I don't want to hold things up, but nor do I want a test suite that doesn't match our spec. --GlenReceived on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 20:57:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:45 GMT