W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Mostly red report

From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:20:05 -0800
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-id: <440A8315.5050806@sun.com>

Thanks a lot!

test1251 for Sun->Sun fails with the following assertion:

not(soap12:Envelope/soap12:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address = 
'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous')

The SOAP request message contains two ReplyTo address, one with "none" 
env:Role and one without. The second ReplyTo contains non-anonymous 
address. Is it possible that the assertions are checking only for the 
first ReplyTo address and reporting the test as failed ?

-Arun

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Done (by Paul).  Turned a few greens to red, pending implementation of 
> the updated testcase.
> 
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* David Illsley [mailto:david.illsley@uk.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 03, 2006 2:19 AM
> *To:* Arun Gupta
> *Cc:* Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests; 
> public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Mostly red report
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Sorry Arun, I said I'd do that.
> 
> I've just tried and for some reason I can't commit to CVS... getting a 
> uesless error message :-(
> 
> It's a pretty simple change - change the description to indicate an 
> application fault, add an assertion:
>         <assert 
> test="not(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase 
> and @message!='1']) or 
> count(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase 
> and @message!='1']/log:content/*) = 0"/>
> 
> and remove the assertions for ant messages 2,3,4
> 
> Paul, Hugo, Jonathan, could one of you do this for me as I can't get CVS 
> to work?
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> David Illsley
> Web Services Development
> MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
> david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
> 
> *Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>*
> Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> 
> 02/03/2006 17:31
> 
> 	
> 
> To
> 
> 	
> 
> Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
> 
> cc
> 
> 	
> 
> David Illsley/UK/IBM@IBMGB, WS-Addressing Tests 
> <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, 
> public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> 
> Subject
> 
> 	
> 
> Re: Mostly red report
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 	
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>  Sun logs don't get past 1234...
> I do see Sun logs beyond 1234, so not sure what you meant here.
> 
> Also, it seems like 1152 and 1252 descriptions have not been updated and
> that's why Sun logs are failing on that. We agreed on the last call that
> this would send a non-anonymous ReplyTo and none FaultTo. The endpoint
> will throw a fault and will not be sent back to the client.
> 
> -Arun
> 
>>
>>  We will remove tests 1145 and 1245 tomorrow, per WG decisions.  Also
>>  1260 will likely be dropped or moved to INFORMATIVE.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM]
>> >Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM
>> >To: David Illsley
>> >Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests-
>> >request@w3.org
>> >Subject: Re: Mostly red report
>> >
>> >test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints
>> >updated.
>> >
>> >I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can
>>
>>  that
>>
>> >be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?
>> >
>> >I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an
>> >explanation there before I implement it.
>> >
>> >-Arun
>> >
>> >David Illsley wrote:
>> >
>> >>Looks  better :-)
>> >>
>> >>...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a
>>
>>  lack
>>
>> >>of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for
>>
>>  1251).
>>
>> >>I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in
>>
>>  the
>>
>> >>testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
>> >>
>> >>In mkschema.xsl:
>> >>
>> >>                                                <xsl:if
>>
>>  test="$num!=1">
>>
>> >>                                                        <xsl:if
>> >>test="count(./s:assert)>0">
>> >>
>> >><sch:rule
>>
>>  context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
>>
>> >><sch:assert
>> >>test="following-
>> >
>>  sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assert
>>  io
>>
>> >n
>> >
>> >>"all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of
>> >>select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/>
>> >>failed</sch:assert>
>> >>
>> ></sch:rule>
>> >
>> >>                                                        </xsl:if>
>> >>                                                </xsl:if>
>> >>
>> >>This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the
>> >>Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up
>>
>>  any
>>
>> >>red we aren't expecting?
>> >>
>> >>I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening
>> >>(it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
>> >>
>> >>Cheers,
>> >>David
>> >>
>> >>David Illsley
>> >>Web Services Development
>> >>MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>> >>+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
>> >>david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>*"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
>> >>Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>> >>
>> >>02/03/2006 14:50
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>To
>> >>                 "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests"
>> >><public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
>> >>cc
>> >>
>> >>Subject
>> >>                 RE: Mostly red report
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect.
>> >>Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild will
>>
>>  tell.
>>
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>
>>  [mailto:public-ws-
>>
>> >> > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
>> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
>> >> > To: WS-Addressing Tests
>> >> > Subject: Mostly red report
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly
>> >>green
>> >> > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
>> >> >
>> >> > -Arun
>> >> > --
>> >> > got Web Services ?
>> >> > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>> >> > http://java.sun.com/webservices
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >--
>> >got Web Services ?
>> >Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>> >http://java.sun.com/webservices
> 
> -- 
> got Web Services ?
> Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
> http://java.sun.com/webservices
> 

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Sunday, 5 March 2006 06:18:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC