W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Mostly red report

From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:18:59 +0000
To: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WS-Addressing Tests <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD298FD7A.9F0B7477-ON80257126.00386534-80257126.0038A61A@uk.ibm.com>
Sorry Arun, I said I'd do that.

I've just tried and for some reason I can't commit to CVS... getting a 
uesless error message :-(

It's a pretty simple change - change the description to indicate an 
application fault, add an assertion:
        <assert test=
"not(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase 
and @message!='1']) or 
count(../following-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase 
and @message!='1']/log:content/*) = 0"/>

and remove the assertions for ant messages 2,3,4

Paul, Hugo, Jonathan, could one of you do this for me as I can't get CVS 
to work?

Thanks,
David

David Illsley
Web Services Development
MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
david.illsley@uk.ibm.com



Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM> 
Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
02/03/2006 17:31

To
Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
cc
David Illsley/UK/IBM@IBMGB, WS-Addressing Tests 
<public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>, 
public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
Subject
Re: Mostly red report







> 
> Sun logs don't get past 1234...
I do see Sun logs beyond 1234, so not sure what you meant here.

Also, it seems like 1152 and 1252 descriptions have not been updated and 
that's why Sun logs are failing on that. We agreed on the last call that 
this would send a non-anonymous ReplyTo and none FaultTo. The endpoint 
will throw a fault and will not be sent back to the client.

-Arun

> 
> We will remove tests 1145 and 1245 tomorrow, per WG decisions.  Also
> 1260 will likely be dropped or moved to INFORMATIVE.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Arun Gupta [mailto:Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM]
>>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM
>>To: David Illsley
>>Cc: Jonathan Marsh; WS-Addressing Tests; public-ws-addressing-tests-
>>request@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: Mostly red report
>>
>>test1147 for IBM->Sun and Microsoft->Sun is now fixed and endpoints
>>updated.
>>
>>I dont have an easy way to test1147 and test1248 for Sun->Sun. Can
> 
> that
> 
>>be updated in the stylesheet to reflect that ?
>>
>>I sent a separate mail about test1251 and still looking for an
>>explanation there before I implement it.
>>
>>-Arun
>>
>>David Illsley wrote:
>>
>>>Looks  better :-)
>>>
>>>...but maybe not quite right (Microsoft -> Sun is failing 'cos of a
> 
> lack
> 
>>>of a message 2 in 1251 and message 2 shouldn't be required for
> 
> 1251).
> 
>>>I think the following should fix it so that only message elements in
> 
> the
> 
>>>testcases.xml which have associated assertions become required.
>>>
>>>In mkschema.xsl:
>>>
>>>                                                <xsl:if
> 
> test="$num!=1">
> 
>>>                                                        <xsl:if
>>>test="count(./s:assert)>0">
>>>
>>><sch:rule
> 
> context="log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='1']">
> 
>>><sch:assert
>>>test="following-
>>
> sibling::log:message[@testcase='{$testcase}'][@message='{$num}']">assert
> io
> 
>>n
>>
>>>"all required messages present" against <xsl:value-of
>>>select="$testcase"/> message <xsl:value-of select="$num"/>
>>>failed</sch:assert>
>>>
>></sch:rule>
>>
>>>                                                        </xsl:if>
>>>                                                </xsl:if>
>>>
>>>This makes the IBM->Sun failure on 1251 show up and also that the
>>>Microsoft logs need some renumbering but I don't think it throws up
> 
> any
> 
>>>red we aren't expecting?
>>>
>>>I'll generate new reports against those who have asked this evening
>>>(it's easier to do at home because of firewall issues).
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>David
>>>
>>>David Illsley
>>>Web Services Development
>>>MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>>>+44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049)
>>>david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
>>>
>>>
>>>*"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>*
>>>Sent by: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
>>>
>>>02/03/2006 14:50
>>>
>>>
>>>To
>>>              "Arun Gupta" <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, "WS-Addressing Tests"
>>><public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
>>>cc
>>>
>>>Subject
>>>              RE: Mostly red report
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>My bad, my fix for the "missing message" case caused a side effect.
>>>Checked in a version I'm more confident in.  The next rebuild will
> 
> tell.
> 
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org
> 
> [mailto:public-ws-
> 
>>> > addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arun Gupta
>>> > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:51 AM
>>> > To: WS-Addressing Tests
>>> > Subject: Mostly red report
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The report (dated Thu Mar 2 13:08:37 2006 UTC) turned from mostly
>>>green
>>> > to mostly red. It anybody investigating that ?
>>> >
>>> > -Arun
>>> > --
>>> > got Web Services ?
>>> > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>>> > http://java.sun.com/webservices
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>>got Web Services ?
>>Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
>>http://java.sun.com/webservices

-- 
got Web Services ?
Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from
http://java.sun.com/webservices
Received on Friday, 3 March 2006 10:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:42 UTC