W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org > January to March 2007

2004/ws/addressing ws-addr-wsdl.html,1.54,1.55

From: Tony Rogers via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:07:28 +0000
To: public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1HCDJI-0002oN-Rc@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv10248

Modified Files:
	ws-addr-wsdl.html 
Log Message:
Updated to incorporate latest changes for LC draft

Index: ws-addr-wsdl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-wsdl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.54
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -C 2 -d -r1.54 -r1.55
*** ws-addr-wsdl.html	30 Jan 2007 10:47:32 -0000	1.54
--- ws-addr-wsdl.html	31 Jan 2007 11:07:26 -0000	1.55
***************
*** 737,754 ****
                          default pattern is used. Note that the SOAPAction value is not required to
                          be an absolute IRI, but the [action] property is required to be an absolute
!                         IRI; if wsam:UsingAddressing is present, wsam:Action is not specified, and
!                         the SOAPAction value is not empty or an absolute IRI, then the document MUST
!                         be considered invalid. Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding[<cite><a href="#WSADDR-SOAP">WS-Addressing SOAP Binding</a></cite>]
!                         specifies restrictions on the relationship between the values of [action]
!                         and SOAPAction for SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2.</p>
!                     <p>The inclusion of wsam:Action without inclusion of wsam:UsingAddressing has no
!                         normative intent and is only informational. In other words, the inclusion of
!                         wsam:Action attributes in WSDL alone does not imply a requirement on clients
!                         to use Message Addressing Properties in messages it sends to the service. A
!                         client, however, MAY include Message Addressing Properties in the messages
!                         it sends, either on its own initiative or as described by other elements of
!                         the service contract, regardless of the presence or absence of
!                         wsam:UsingAddressing. Other specifications defining the value of [action]
!                         are under no constraint to be consistent with wsam:Action.</p>
                      <p>For example consider the following WSDL excerpt:</p>
                      <div class="exampleOuter">
--- 737,756 ----
                          default pattern is used. Note that the SOAPAction value is not required to
                          be an absolute IRI, but the [action] property is required to be an absolute
!                         IRI; if WS-Addressing is required (the wsam:Addressing assertion is
!                         present), wsam:Action is not specified, and the SOAPAction value is not
!                         empty or an absolute IRI, then the document MUST be considered invalid.
!                             Web Services Addressing 1.0 - SOAP Binding[<cite><a href="#WSADDR-SOAP">WS-Addressing SOAP Binding</a></cite>] specifies restrictions
!                         on the relationship between the values of [action] and SOAPAction for SOAP
!                         1.1 and SOAP 1.2.</p>
!                     <p>The inclusion of wsam:Action without the inclusion of the wsam:Addressing
!                         assertion has no normative intent and is only informational. In other words,
!                         the inclusion of wsam:Action attributes in WSDL alone does not imply a
!                         requirement on clients to use Message Addressing Properties in messages it
!                         sends to the service. A client, however, MAY include Message Addressing
!                         Properties in the messages it sends, either on its own initiative or as
!                         described by other elements of the service contract, regardless of the
!                         presence or absence of the wsam:Addressing assertion. Other specifications
!                         defining the value of [action] are under no constraint to be consistent with
!                         wsam:Action.</p>
                      <p>For example consider the following WSDL excerpt:</p>
                      <div class="exampleOuter">
***************
*** 1748,1755 ****
    <p>Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by
        alphabetical order):
!       Abbie Barbir (Nortel Networks), Andreas Bj&auml;rlestam (ERICSSON), Dave Chappell (Sonic Software), Eran Chinthaka (WSO2), Francisco Curbera (IBM Corporation), Glen Daniels (Sonic Software), Vikas Deolaliker (Sonoa Systems, Inc.), Paul Downey (BT), Jacques Durand (Fujitsu Limited), Robert Freund (Hitachi, Ltd.), Marc Goodner (Microsoft Corporation), Arun Gupta (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Hugo Haas (W3C/ERCIM), Marc Hadley (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), David Hull (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Yin-Leng Husband (HP), David Illsley (IBM Corporation), Anish Karmarkar (Oracle Corporation), Paul Knight (Nortel Networks), Philippe Le H&eacute;garet (W3C/MIT), Amelia Lewis (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Bozhong Lin (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Mark Little (JBoss Inc.), Jonathan Marsh (Microsoft Corporation), Jeff Mischkinsky (Oracle Corporation), Nilo Mitra (ERICSSON), Eisaku Nishiyama (Hitachi, Ltd.), Ales Novy (Systinet Inc.), David Orchard (BEA Systems, Inc.), Gilbert Pilz (BEA Systems, Inc.), Alain Regnier (Ricoh Company, Lt.), Tony Rogers (Computer Associates), Tom Rutt (Fujitsu Limited), Davanum Srinivas (WSO2), Jiri Tejkl (Systinet Inc.), Mike Vernal (Microsoft Corporation), Steve Vinoski (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Katy Warr (IBM Corporation), Pete Wenzel (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Steve Winkler (SAP AG), &Uuml;mit Yal&ccedil;inalp (SAP AG), Prasad Yendluri (webMethods, Inc.).
    </p>
    <p>Previous members of the Working Group were:
!       Lisa Bahler (SAIC - Telcordia Technologies), Rebecca Bergersen (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Ugo Corda (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Michael Eder (Nokia), Yaron Goland (BEA Systems, Inc.), Marc Goodner (SAP AG), Martin Gudgin (Microsoft Corporation), Mark Nottingham (BEA Systems, Inc.), Mark Peel (Novell, Inc.), Harris Reynolds (webMethods, Inc.), Rich Salz (IBM Corporation), Davanum Srinivas (Computer Associates), Greg Truty (IBM Corporation).
    </p>
    <p>The people who have contributed to <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/">discussions
--- 1750,1771 ----
    <p>Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by
        alphabetical order):
!       Abbie Barbir (Nortel Networks), Andreas Bj&auml;rlestam (ERICSSON), Dave Chappell (Sonic Software), Eran Chinthaka (WSO2), Francisco Curbera (IBM Corporation), Glen Daniels (Sonic Software), Vikas Deolaliker (Sonoa Systems, Inc.), Paul Downey (BT), Jacques Durand (Fujitsu Limited), Robert Freund (Hitachi, Ltd.), Marc Goodner (Microsoft Corporation), Arun Gupta (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Marc Hadley (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), David Hull (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Yin-Leng Husband (HP), David Illsley (IBM Corporation), Anish Karmarkar (Oracle Corporation), Paul Knight (Nortel Networks), Philippe Le H&eacute;garet (W3C/MIT), Amelia Lewis (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Bozhong Lin (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Mark Little (JBoss Inc.), Jeganathan Markandu (Nortel Networks), Jeff Mischkinsky (Oracle Corporation), Nilo Mitra (ERICSSON), Eisaku Nishiyama (Hitachi, Ltd.), Ales Novy (Systinet Inc.), David Orchard (BEA Systems, Inc.), Gilbert Pilz (BEA Systems, Inc.), Alain Regnier (Ricoh Company, Ltd.), Tony Rogers (Computr Associates), Tom Rutt (Fujitsu Limited), Davanum Srinivas (WSO2), Jiri Tejkl (Systinet Inc.), Steve Vinoski (IONA Technologies, Inc.), Katy Warr (IBM Corporation), Pete Wenzel (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Steve Winkler (SAP AG), &Uuml;mit Yal&ccedil;inalp (SAP AG), Prasad Yendluri (webMethods, Inc.).
    </p>
    <p>Previous members of the Working Group were:
!       Lisa Bahler (SAIC - Telcordia Technologies),
! Rebecca Bergersen (IONA Technologies, Inc.),
! Ugo Corda (Sun Microsystems, Inc.),
! Michael Eder (Nokia),
! Yaron Goland (BEA Systems, Inc.),
! Martin Gudgin (Microsoft Corporation),
! Hugo Haas (W3C),
! Jonathan Marsh (Microsoft Corporation),
! Mark Nottingham (BEA Systems, Inc.),
! Mark Peel (Novell, Inc.),
! Harris Reynolds (webMethods, Inc.),
! Rich Salz (IBM Corporation),
! Davanum Srinivas (Computer Associates),
! Greg Truty (IBM Corporation).
! 
    </p>
    <p>The people who have contributed to <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/">discussions
***************
*** 1802,1806 ****
                  
  <h3><a name="N10D6B"></a>C.1 Changes Since Candidate Recommendation Draft</h3>
!                 <table border="1"><tr><th>Date</th><th>Editor</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>2007-01-30 @ 10:44</td><td>trogers</td><td>Adjusted definitions of response assertions, Replaced section 3.1.4 (moved to 3.1.6 and changed content)</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-29 @ 09:37</td><td>trogers</td><td>Corrected the captions on examples 3-5 and 3-10</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-22 @ 22:58</td><td>trogers</td><td>Corrected message label case in example 4-5 - editorial</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-22 @ 22:45</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented editorial changes resulting from 23Jan telecon.
  Implemented CR40 and CR42.</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-14 @ 20:31</td><td>trogers</td><td>removed UsingAddressing and SOAP module, updated conformance to suit, added None URI as acceptable</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-10 @ 11:26</td><td>trogers</td><td>Changed the namespace and namespace prefix for this document
  Corrected introduction and conformance section</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-05 @ 14:20</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented the resolutions of CR33 and CR44: policy assertions for using addressing and anon/non-anon responses</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-03 @ 12:28</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented the resolution of CR30 - SOAPAction not empty or absolute IRI makes the document invalid</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-03 @ 11:38</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented CR26 and CR28 about the rules for populating the [action] property.</td></tr></table>
--- 1818,1822 ----
                  
  <h3><a name="N10D6B"></a>C.1 Changes Since Candidate Recommendation Draft</h3>
!                 <table border="1"><tr><th>Date</th><th>Editor</th><th>Description</th></tr><tr><td>2007-01-31 @ 10:57</td><td>trogers</td><td>Removed the last traces of UsingAddressing</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-30 @ 10:44</td><td>trogers</td><td>Adjusted definitions of response assertions, Replaced section 3.1.4 (moved to 3.1.6 and changed content)</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-29 @ 09:37</td><td>trogers</td><td>Corrected the captions on examples 3-5 and 3-10</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-22 @ 22:58</td><td>trogers</td><td>Corrected message label case in example 4-5 - editorial</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-22 @ 22:45</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented editorial changes resulting from 23Jan telecon.
  Implemented CR40 and CR42.</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-14 @ 20:31</td><td>trogers</td><td>removed UsingAddressing and SOAP module, updated conformance to suit, added None URI as acceptable</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-10 @ 11:26</td><td>trogers</td><td>Changed the namespace and namespace prefix for this document
  Corrected introduction and conformance section</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-05 @ 14:20</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented the resolutions of CR33 and CR44: policy assertions for using addressing and anon/non-anon responses</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-03 @ 12:28</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented the resolution of CR30 - SOAPAction not empty or absolute IRI makes the document invalid</td></tr><tr><td>2007-01-03 @ 11:38</td><td>trogers</td><td>Implemented CR26 and CR28 about the rules for populating the [action] property.</td></tr></table>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:07:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:41 GMT