W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org > January to March 2007

2004/ws/addressing ws-addr-wsdl.xml,1.113,1.114

From: Tony Rogers via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:57:31 +0000
To: public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1HCD9f-0002fv-DD@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv9724

Modified Files:
	ws-addr-wsdl.xml 
Log Message:
Removed the last traces of UsingAddressing

Index: ws-addr-wsdl.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-wsdl.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.113
retrieving revision 1.114
diff -C 2 -d -r1.113 -r1.114
*** ws-addr-wsdl.xml	30 Jan 2007 10:44:20 -0000	1.113
--- ws-addr-wsdl.xml	31 Jan 2007 10:57:28 -0000	1.114
***************
*** 715,732 ****
                          default pattern is used. Note that the SOAPAction value is not required to
                          be an absolute IRI, but the [action] property is required to be an absolute
!                         IRI; if wsam:UsingAddressing is present, wsam:Action is not specified, and
!                         the SOAPAction value is not empty or an absolute IRI, then the document MUST
!                         be considered invalid. &wsa-soap.title;[<bibref ref="WSADDR-SOAP"/>]
!                         specifies restrictions on the relationship between the values of [action]
!                         and SOAPAction for SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2.</p>
!                     <p>The inclusion of wsam:Action without inclusion of wsam:UsingAddressing has no
!                         normative intent and is only informational. In other words, the inclusion of
!                         wsam:Action attributes in WSDL alone does not imply a requirement on clients
!                         to use Message Addressing Properties in messages it sends to the service. A
!                         client, however, MAY include Message Addressing Properties in the messages
!                         it sends, either on its own initiative or as described by other elements of
!                         the service contract, regardless of the presence or absence of
!                         wsam:UsingAddressing. Other specifications defining the value of [action]
!                         are under no constraint to be consistent with wsam:Action.</p>
                      <p>For example consider the following WSDL excerpt:</p>
                      <example>
--- 715,734 ----
                          default pattern is used. Note that the SOAPAction value is not required to
                          be an absolute IRI, but the [action] property is required to be an absolute
!                         IRI; if WS-Addressing is required (the wsam:Addressing assertion is
!                         present), wsam:Action is not specified, and the SOAPAction value is not
!                         empty or an absolute IRI, then the document MUST be considered invalid.
!                             &wsa-soap.title;[<bibref ref="WSADDR-SOAP"/>] specifies restrictions
!                         on the relationship between the values of [action] and SOAPAction for SOAP
!                         1.1 and SOAP 1.2.</p>
!                     <p>The inclusion of wsam:Action without the inclusion of the wsam:Addressing
!                         assertion has no normative intent and is only informational. In other words,
!                         the inclusion of wsam:Action attributes in WSDL alone does not imply a
!                         requirement on clients to use Message Addressing Properties in messages it
!                         sends to the service. A client, however, MAY include Message Addressing
!                         Properties in the messages it sends, either on its own initiative or as
!                         described by other elements of the service contract, regardless of the
!                         presence or absence of the wsam:Addressing assertion. Other specifications
!                         defining the value of [action] are under no constraint to be consistent with
!                         wsam:Action.</p>
                      <p>For example consider the following WSDL excerpt:</p>
                      <example>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:57:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:41 GMT