W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org > January to March 2006

2004/ws/addressing ws-addr-soap.xml,1.110,1.111

From: Marc Hadley via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:52:16 +0000
To: public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FEUYi-0002oF-Ge@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv10740

Modified Files:
	ws-addr-soap.xml 
Log Message:
Added CR18 resolution. Also fixed some terminology 'response endpoint' to '[reply endpoint] property, changed explicit URIs to use predefined entity and fixed use of invalid markup '<a>' to '<xspecref>'

Index: ws-addr-soap.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-soap.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.110
retrieving revision 1.111
diff -C2 -d -r1.110 -r1.111
*** ws-addr-soap.xml	18 Feb 2006 23:38:39 -0000	1.110
--- ws-addr-soap.xml	1 Mar 2006 16:52:14 -0000	1.111
***************
*** 437,449 ****
        <div2 id="anonaddress">
          <head>Use of Anonymous Address in SOAP</head>
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
!           <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified for the response
!             endpoint then there is no change to the SOAP 1.1/ HTTP binding. </p>
          </div3>
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.2</head>
!           <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified for the response
!             endpoint and the request is the request part of a SOAP request-response MEP [<bibref
                ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>], then any response MUST be the response part of the same SOAP
              request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>].</p>
--- 437,451 ----
        <div2 id="anonaddress">
          <head>Use of Anonymous Address in SOAP</head>
+         <p>A value of "&nsuri;/anonymous" for 
+           the [destination] property implies no particular semantics.</p>
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
!           <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is specified for the [reply
!             endpoint] property then there is no change to the SOAP 1.1/ HTTP binding. </p>
          </div3>
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.2</head>
!           <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is specified for the [reply
!             endpoint] property and the message is the request part of a SOAP request-response MEP [<bibref
                ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>], then any response MUST be the response part of the same SOAP
              request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>].</p>
***************
*** 454,472 ****
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
!           <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is not specified for the response
!             endpoint, then the request SHOULD be part of a binding (such as <ednote>
!               <edtext>reference to the one-way/request-optional-response SOAP 1.1/HTTP MEP note as
!                 per <a
!                   href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Feb/0107.html"
!                   >David Orchard's draft.</a></edtext>
!             </ednote> ) that supports not returning a SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any
              response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using the address value
              specified by response endpoint. Note that other specifications MAY define special URIs
              that have other behaviours (similar to the anonymous URI).</p>
          </div3>
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.2</head>
!           <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is not specified for the response
!             endpoint, then any response SHOULD not be the response part of the same SOAP
              request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>]. For instance, a SOAP 1.2 HTTP
              binding that supports a one-way MEP could put the reply message in a separate one-way
--- 456,474 ----
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
!           <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is not specified for the [reply
!             endpoint] property, then the message SHOULD be part of a binding that supports not returning a SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any
              response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using the address value
              specified by response endpoint. Note that other specifications MAY define special URIs
              that have other behaviours (similar to the anonymous URI).</p>
+           <ednote>
+             <edtext>See, e.g., the one-way/request-optional-response SOAP 1.1/HTTP MEP note as
+               per <xspecref href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Feb/0107.html">David Orchard's draft.</xspecref>
+             </edtext>
+           </ednote>
          </div3>
          <div3>
            <head>SOAP 1.2</head>
!           <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is not specified for the [reply
!             endpoint] property, then any response SHOULD not be the response part of the same SOAP
              request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>]. For instance, a SOAP 1.2 HTTP
              binding that supports a one-way MEP could put the reply message in a separate one-way
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:52:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:41 GMT