W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org > January to March 2006

2004/ws/addressing ws-addr-soap.xml,1.109,1.110

From: Tony Rogers via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:38:41 +0000
To: public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FAbez-000693-Fc@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv23606

Modified Files:
	ws-addr-soap.xml 
Log Message:
Added editorial note in place of a reference to the WG Note which will define the SOAP 1.1/HTTP request/optional-response MEP.

Index: ws-addr-soap.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-soap.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.109
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -C2 -d -r1.109 -r1.110
*** ws-addr-soap.xml	8 Feb 2006 07:05:41 -0000	1.109
--- ws-addr-soap.xml	18 Feb 2006 23:38:39 -0000	1.110
***************
*** 455,463 ****
            <head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
            <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is not specified for the response
!             endpoint, then the request SHOULD be part of a binding that supports not returning a
!             SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any response message SHOULD be sent using a separate
!             connection and using the address value specified by response endpoint. Note that other
!             specifications MAY define special URIs that have other behaviours (similar to the
!             anonymous URI).</p>
          </div3>
          <div3>
--- 455,467 ----
            <head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
            <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is not specified for the response
!             endpoint, then the request SHOULD be part of a binding (such as <ednote>
!               <edtext>reference to the one-way/request-optional-response SOAP 1.1/HTTP MEP note as
!                 per <a
!                   href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Feb/0107.html"
!                   >David Orchard's draft.</a></edtext>
!             </ednote> ) that supports not returning a SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any
!             response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using the address value
!             specified by response endpoint. Note that other specifications MAY define special URIs
!             that have other behaviours (similar to the anonymous URI).</p>
          </div3>
          <div3>
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2006 23:38:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:41 GMT