W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: [Editorial][SOAP] MessageId vs MessageID

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:44:45 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5077A8367@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <dims@apache.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.  The WG agreed to change the property URL to
end in a capital D.  Let us know within two weeks if you don't agree
with this resolution.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Davanum Srinivas
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 2:36 PM
> To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Fwd: [Editorial][SOAP] MessageId vs MessageID
> 
> 
> Resending...can't see this email in the archive.
> 
> -- dims
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 15, 2005 7:02 PM
> Subject: [Editorial][SOAP] MessageId vs MessageID
> To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> 
> 
> Core spec uses MessageID...Section 2.3 Properties (in SOAP) uses
> MessageId
> 
> thanks,
> dims
> 
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> 
> 
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 20:50:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:38 GMT