W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Last Call Comment (Core): WS-Addressing restricted to XML 1.0 or not?

From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 10:45:04 -0700
Message-ID: <42766720.9000306@webmethods.com>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
CC: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org, mark.nottingham@bea.com
Hi,

The resolution does not match the issue. It seems the resolution for LC1 
and LC4 got interchanged in sending out these email.
This is the resolution for LC1 and not LC4.

Regards, Prasad
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Last Call Comment (Core): WS-Addressing restricted to XML 
1.0 or not?
Date: 	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:20:26 -0700
From: 	Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
To: 	Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
CC: 	<public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>



Thank you for your comment [1].  The WG decided to add to the second
paragraph of section 5, is "The [message ID], [fault endpoint] and
[reply endpoint] properties facilitate the delivery and correlation of
faults."  The editors may also add a reference to the Core.

Please let us know if this resolution is acceptable.  Absent a response
within two weeks, we will presume the resolution is acceptable to you.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc4

> Ref: WS-Addressing 1.0 Core 
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331)
> 
> The Editorial Note on page 2 of the specification (at the bottom of
> the section "Status of the Document") states:
> 
> "The Web Services Addressing Working Group has decided to use XML 
> Schema, where appropriate, to describe constructs defined in this 
> specification. Note that this restricts use of Web Services Addressing
> to XML 1.0."
> 
> However, later towards the end of section 1.2 it stated,
> 
> "Examples in this specification use an XML 1.0 [XML 1.0 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/#XML10>] 
> representation but this is not a requirement."
> 
> These two statements seem to contradict.
> 
> Regards, Prasad
> 
Received on Monday, 2 May 2005 17:45:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:38 GMT