W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org > July 2005

RE: Rough draft of rational for using xml shema 1.0 data types

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:19:19 -0700
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D641652149F3@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: <tom@coastin.com>, <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>

I would add a sentence along the lines of 

{The introduction XML 1.1 causes interoperability concerns in real
implementations far out of proportion to the profferred benefits at the
abstract level.} 

After the second sentence in your writeup. 

--umit


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On 
> Behalf Of Tom Rutt
> Sent: Tuesday, Jul 19, 2005 7:52 AM
> To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Rough draft of rational for using xml shema 1.0 data types
> 
> 
> Here is a first cut at a rationale:
> 
> "This specification uses xml schema 1.0 data types to specify the 
> contents of its soap headers.  This was deemed necessary to 
> define the 
> contents with sufficient precision to foster 
> interoperability.  Future 
> versions of this specification may be revised to incorporate schema 
> definitions compatible with xml 1.1."
> 
> Tom Rutt
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt	email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 15:19:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:38 GMT