- From: Martinez K. <km@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:43:20 +0000
- To: "public-wot-ig@w3.org" <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
"part" yes - but as far as I know WS are on TCP - whereas we should include CoAP over UDP... Cheers Kirk On 17/09/2019 07:53, Dave Raggett wrote: > For the record, there are several independent proposals for how to use > Web Sockets which should form part of the discussion wherever it takes > place. > >> On 17 Sep 2019, at 07:45, Ege Korkan <ege.korkan@tum.de >> <mailto:ege.korkan@tum.de>> wrote: >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> I am still having the opinion that this topic could be covered in the >> protocol bindings task force, which would be more than happy to have >> you onboard! There we can talk of defining the default http/ws >> protocol binding which could be named as the Web Thing Protocol. We >> can have a separate document but this would look like "yet another >> standard" from my point of view. >> >> In the meantime, I have found this draft from you: >> https://iot.mozilla.org/wot/ >> >> It seems to be up to date and referencing the W3C WoT Thing >> Description. However, it is still using the Mozilla way of doing >> things and not really using the W3C WoT Thing Description and defining >> a new "Thing Description". Moreover, I couldn't find a way to write >> issues or discuss things, thus the email. Is this a preliminary >> version until the Community Group is formed? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Ege >> >> >> On 09/16/2019 03:52 PM, Benjamin Francis wrote: >>> Dear WoT IG/WG members, >>> >>> I'm writing to announce the proposal >>> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fcommunity%2Fblog%2F2019%2F09%2F16%2Fproposed-group-web-thing-protocol-community-group%2F&data=01%7C01%7Ckm%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C9f92be4b3dfb43be49d608d73b3bcc69%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=yPxoOKA3RyLFrnOzYXxDT8CaS2xLKv%2FRvs%2Bc8NuSENg%3D&reserved=0> >>> of a Web Thing Protocol Community group. >>> >>> The purpose of this group is to complement the work of the IG and WG >>> by defining a common protocol for communicating with devices over the >>> web, to enable ad-hoc interoperability on the Web of Things. >>> >>> This work is intended to complement or extend the WoT Thing >>> Description >>> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fwot-thing-description%2F&data=01%7C01%7Ckm%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C9f92be4b3dfb43be49d608d73b3bcc69%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=XQNjQXbx0RqZCUfsMdNGpQgEoKAHleEEY3gokdAM960%3D&reserved=0> >>> with a WebSocket sub-protocol, as well as the evaluation of other >>> potential Web of Things protocol bindings. >>> >>> Please see the proposed Web Thing Protocol Community Group Charter >>> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbenfrancis.github.io%2Fweb-thing-protocol-charter%2F&data=01%7C01%7Ckm%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C9f92be4b3dfb43be49d608d73b3bcc69%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=iipz%2BvwIYrR3HSF5kfZLNu2E97tg3G4lHw2NhEj2VKc%3D&reserved=0> >>> for more information. I welcome your feedback and invite you to >>> support the group >>> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fcommunity%2Fgroups%2Fproposed%2F&data=01%7C01%7Ckm%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C9f92be4b3dfb43be49d608d73b3bcc69%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=tx8O38Nj1%2BvQmQ%2FMqaSciT6littUdrB70eRR0NX%2FzZk%3D&reserved=0> >>> via the W3C's website. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Ben >> > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> > http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FPeople%2FRaggett&data=01%7C01%7Ckm%40ecs.soton.ac.uk%7C9f92be4b3dfb43be49d608d73b3bcc69%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C0&sdata=HScpW0mOS6tACVA3TdRod4X5wIMN4HWJeXfw11N2zpI%3D&reserved=0> > W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things > > > -- https://www.soton.ac.uk/~km2/
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2019 15:43:48 UTC