W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > September 2016

Re: schema.org IoT

From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:01:01 +0530
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
Cc: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-web-of-things <public-web-of-things@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Message-ID: <dddbb9a4-ef1a-a19c-ff26-1a5d02e4f74c@eurecom.fr>
Good initiative, thanks for sharing.

Soumya

Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 |
https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

On 09-09-2016 14:56, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
> On 9 September 2016 at 11:20, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org 
> <mailto:bergi@axolotlfarm.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     Dan Brickley started an effort to bring IoT to schema.org
>     <http://schema.org> [1][2]. An
>     ontology, that contains the core things and properties, is a
>     requirement
>     for the interoperable Web of Things. schema.org
>     <http://schema.org> is one of the most
>     widespread ontologies used on the web. Therefore I think the group
>     should join the discussion and consider to choose that ontology for
>     examples and maybe even recommend the usage of that ontology when it's
>     ready.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>     bergi
>
>     [1]
>     https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1272#issuecomment-243536129
>     <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1272#issuecomment-243536129>
>     [2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sdo-iot-sync
>     <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/sdo-iot-sync>
>
>
Received on Friday, 9 September 2016 09:31:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 9 September 2016 09:31:02 UTC