- From: Roger Hågensen <rh_whatwg@skuldwyrm.no>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:01:50 +0200
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 2016-10-06 14:15, MegaZone wrote: > How is this any different from PHP, ASP, JSP, .Net, ColdFusion, etc? You > could implement your CML on the backend and have it 'output' > XML/HTML+JavaScript+CSS for delivery to user agents with compatibility with > everything out there today. >... > There are many server-side options and it really sounds like that's where > CML would fit. Your developers would write in CML, and the 'engine' would > render that into the appropriate content for delivery to UAs. Yeah! For example, I'm working on a offline CMS that actually uses include/declaration files for all the components of a static site. The CMS will grab all that apply templates and "render" the finished html, PHP is actually used to power this CMS. > Personally I don't see value in this proposal. I have to agree, I almost feel like I'm being trolled at this point. Unless a post or a "diagram" shows up that makes me go "Ah! Now I see!" I'm not going to bother responding to any further posts on this subject. -- Roger Hågensen, Freelancer, http://skuldwyrm.no/
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 13:02:58 UTC