- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:22:58 +1300
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan > <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > > My understanding is that the current consensus proposal for canvas in > > Workers is not what's in the spec, but this: > > https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/WorkerCanvas > > See "Canvas in Workers" threads from October 2013 for the discussion. svn > > is failing me but the CanvasProxy proposal in the spec definitely > predates > > those threads. > > > > Ian, unless I'm wrong, it would be helpful to remove the CanvasProxy > stuff > > from the spec to avoid confusion. > > > > That proposal contains WorkerCanvas.toBlob, which needs to be updated to > > use promises. > > There's also https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/WorkerCanvas2 it seems. It > would be interesting to know what the latest on this is. > Right now that appears to be just a copy of WorkerCanvas with some boilerplate text added. I assume someone's working on it and will mention it on this list if/when they're ready to discuss it :-). Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 20:23:22 UTC